# FILE NAME: 00000028.soc
# TITLE: Should there be more or less government funding for primary schools? [806b966c51437409fcdcfe0d73581d83]
# DESCRIPTION: 
# DATA TYPE: soc
# MODIFICATION TYPE: original
# RELATES TO: 
# RELATED FILES: 
# PUBLICATION DATE: 2025-10-12
# MODIFICATION DATE: 2025-10-12
# NUMBER ALTERNATIVES: 4
# NUMBER VOTERS: 5
# NUMBER UNIQUE ORDERS: 1
# ALTERNATIVE NAME 1: Statement 1 - There should be more government funding for primary schools. A well-funded education system is essential for a prosperous society. In the future, the world will be increasingly based on science and technology, therefore more government funding for primary schools should be a priority. The new funding could be used to invest in advanced teaching resources, to improve the quality of teaching, to improve the quality of teaching resources, and to reduce class sizes. If more government funding was to be invested into primary schools, there would be a knock-on effect in terms of benefits for society, such as lower crime rates, lower unemployment, and an increased proportion of the population being active in the community.
# ALTERNATIVE NAME 2: Statement 2 - There should be more government funding for primary schools. The government needs to provide the funding required for primary schools to ensure that children receive the best start in life. This includes but is not limited to books, equipment, resources, and staff. This will ensure that our children get the best education they can, thus improving the future of society.
# ALTERNATIVE NAME 3: Statement 3 - More funding is required to improve the learning experience of primary school children.
# ALTERNATIVE NAME 4: Statement 4 - “There should be more government funding for primary schools as this will enable the school to get better teaching resources and equipment. This will in turn allow the school to provide a higher standard of education to their students.“
5: 1,2,4,3